ZO-1 Staining on ARPE-19 Cells grown on MgF2 nanomembranes

The following images are from ARPE-19 Cells cultured for 3 Weeks over here in Nottingham (thanks for help from Emilia Moradi, Victoria Ciampani, and Kevin Webb).

MgF2 nanomembrane chips were positioned into a transwell insert and sealed using PDMS, a biocompatible polymer, creating a two-compartment transwell. After an ethanol sterilization, ARPE-19 cells were seeded in a 12 well plate (100,000 cells/well) on MgF2 nanomembrane inserts and polyester transwells (Transwell® COSTAR 3462, Corning Inc.), having previously incubated the substrates in media (DMEM:F12,penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (0.1 mg/mL), amphotericin (0.25 μg/mL) and Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, 10% v/v,)) for 3 hours. Cells were grown over 3 weeks in an incubator (37 oC, 5% CO2) to confluence on these substrates, exchanging the media every other day.

Confluent cell monolayers were washed with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for approximately 10 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed 3 times with PBS and permeabilised by incubating with Triton X-100 (0.1% v/v in PBS) for approximately 10 min. Cells were then washed with PBS, followed by the application of 1% BSA/PBS for approximately 1 hour. Thereafter, BSA/PBS solution was aspirated and replaced with mouse, anti-human ZO-1 (primary) antibody, diluted in 1% BSA/PBS.  Cell samples were incubated with the primary antibody overnight in the fridge. The primary antibody solution was then removed and cells washed with PBS (3 times). FITC-labelled goat, anti-mouse (secondary) antibody, diluted according to manufacturer’s instructions in 1% BSA/PBS was then applied to the cells for 1 hour. The secondary antibody solution was then aspirated and cells washed with PBS extensively. The Transwell® filter membrane was excised and mounted on glass slides (using DAPI-containing, ProLong® Gold antifade/mounting medium). for confocal imaging, which was performed using a Leica TCS SP2 system mounted on a Leica DMIRE2 inverted microscope. Image stacks were reconstructed using ImageJ.

 

Below are some representative gifs that go through the confocal z-slicing as they were acquired. The ‘scanning’ behavior shows that the MgF2 substrate is tilted. There is some jitter and drift over the 30-45 minutes these stacks were acquired.

Bulk Stack Downsized-2
(40X oil lens) ZO-1 (Green) and Nuclei (Dapi, Blue) on MgF2 nanomembrane chip. The TJ Mosaic is localized to the permeable 200 micron square region, but does extend a few cells beyond the permeable borders.

 

ZO-1 (Green) and Nuclei (Dapi, Blue) on Polyester Transwell. (Permeable Everywhere)
(40x water lens) ZO-1 (Green) and Nuclei (Dapi, Blue) on Polyester Transwell. (Permeable everywhere) Towards the end of the cell stack animation, some of the pores from the polyester support appear fluorescent.

 

Resliced Projection of Image Stacks.
Resliced Projection of Image Stacks. The MgF2 junctions suffer from some defocus and jitter worse than the polyester transwell junctions, though there are still differences. There are mosaics on both substrate types, but the mosaic appears less dense on the MgF2 substrate, as well as having more punctate junctions, rather than a smooth boundary as shown on the polyester. It’s possible that the expression is delayed on the MgF2 substrate, either due to the material or relatively small area of permeability, and culturing longer will produce more contiguous junctions (the original ARPE-19 cell paper cultures for 4-weeks).

 

Shoving the images through a stabilization scheme produces: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kangli/code/Image_Stabilizer.html

Stabilized Bulk Stack Downsized

 

Stabilized Projection 8 bit
Stabilized Projection 8 bit

Here it is easier to see some TJ  expression away from the permeable region in the lower left corner, as well as the upmost point on the MgF2 square.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply